Which Is It?
On June 11, 2006 | 16 Comments | Uncategorized |

Uncharted? or Unchartered?

It’s a debate between Bill and me. I maintain that it’s “uncharted,” and he says “unchartered.”

Of course, I want to wield my English degree and superior vocabulary and deeper knowledge of Latin roots in his face to gain the victory, but he is generally unimpressed (and maybe he should be) by those things when it comes to these debates of ours.

So why not debate it here?

Here’s the issue. When speaking of the unknown, do we use “uncharted,” or “unchartered”? You know what I mean. Here’s an example: Potty-training is a bear; one of the more trying aspects of parenting young children. But when it’s your first child, you have no idea what to expect. Potty-training is new and unventured: it is (uncharted/unchartered) territory.

I say “uncharted” is the correct option. Why would it not be? “Charting” refers to mapping, to revisiting territory that someone (even if it’s not the traveler immediately in question) has been to before. Someone has been there, someone has written it up, someone has created, so to speak, a road map of sorts. The “chart” is that map. If the territory is “uncharted,” then it has, well, never been visited before. You know: Completely Unknown.

But Some People say “unchartered.” What would that mean? Not paid for? What do we charter? Boats, right? You charter a boat to go deep-sea fishing; you charter a plane so that you can propose to your girlfriend at dizzying heights or with a romantic view of the city or whatever. You charter it; you pay for its use; you pay for someone to let you use it while that someone drives the thing. So, in that case, territory is “unchartered” because it isn’t paid for? I don’t get it.

Here’s a quote from today’s Herald-Sun, in an AP story about the Dixie Chicks. It quotes a message from their website, and I quote it here for you: “‘This time around we are willingly feeling our way through unchartered territory.'”

Yep. There it is. Published like that in a respectable publication. I know, I know. They are quoting the Dixie Chicks. But still, Bill showed it to me. An example, in print, of what he believes is the correct term.

The Dixie Chicks.

Weigh in, would you? I really want to know.

Comments 16
Lynne Posted June 11, 2006 at9:18 pm   Reply

I have always said “uncharted”.

Steven Nicholson Posted June 11, 2006 at10:40 pm   Reply

Uncharted. Definitely.If Bill still doesn’t believe you, google it. When I googled “uncharted” I got “about 5,870,000” results. For “unchartered” I got “about 329,000” results. We win almost 18-1. Google proves everything. πŸ™‚

tworivers Posted June 12, 2006 at1:24 am   Reply

uncharted. For the reasons you mention – having to do with mapping an area. I’m reading Patrick O’Brian and he says ‘uncharted’ for seas and islands that are not on the map. Uncharted.Unchartered might refer to hijacking …

Sonya Posted June 12, 2006 at2:07 am   Reply

Definitely uncharted. I have a friend that calls her dresser a “chester drawers” instead of a “chest of drawers”. Just because somebody says it doesn’t make it right…..

Lynne Posted June 12, 2006 at2:19 am   Reply

… and then there are those who think the one wheeled device for hauling things around the garden is called a “wheel barrel”. Again, just because someone said it doesn’t make it right. πŸ™‚

anthony Posted June 12, 2006 at2:23 pm   Reply

Supposably it’s “uncharted.” But that’s hardly a cut-and-drive explanation. I thought it might-could be “unchartered,” but then–all of the sudden–I thought different.πŸ˜‰

etc. whatever Posted June 12, 2006 at4:44 pm   Reply

We consult one of the greatest examples of late 20th century American poetry for the definitive word:The weather started getting rough,the tiny ship was tossed.If not for the courage of the fearless crew,the Minnow would be lost; the Minnow would be lost.The ship took ground on the shore of this uncharted desert isle,with Gilligan, the Skipper too,the Millionaire, and his Wife,the Movie Star, the Professor and Mary Ann,here on Gilligan’s Isle.Gilligan proves everything!Now, try not to hum it the rest of the day…

Anonymous Posted June 12, 2006 at4:56 pm   Reply

Sign me up for “uncharted.” Sorry, Bill. -mbt

Lynne Posted June 12, 2006 at5:30 pm   Reply

Okay, I have a question for Anthony. Have I been wrong my entire life in thinking that the expression was “cut and dry”? You said “cut and drive”. Was this to make a point, or have I missed it?

Anonymous Posted June 12, 2006 at9:53 pm   Reply

uncharted. unquestionably. some of my pet peeves are “could of” instead of “could have”, “chaise lounge” instead of “chaise longue” (the latter is correct, as the french translates to ‘long chair’ – chaise lounge makes no sense – even though google gives the wrong spelling more hits! – google counts usage, but not necessarily proper usage), and “nauseous” (which means to cause nausea) instead of “nauseated” (to have nausea), but i suppose the last one isn’t a homophonic problem.

Rebecca Posted June 12, 2006 at9:53 pm   Reply

I’ll speak for Anthony. I’m pretty darn sure he meant to say “cut and drive,” just like he meant to say “supposably” and that he thought “different,” even though we All Know (don’t we???) that that isn’t right. He’s being funny, because he is.

Willow Posted June 12, 2006 at11:08 pm   Reply

Wait just a minute! I do not still contend that “unchartered” is correct. I have heard it said, and thought it might be correct, but I recall bringing this up with tworivers about a year ago, and her opinion being Almost Always Correct, I was instantly convinced that it’s “uncharted.” So this debate was settled for me long ago in a brief conversation with The Authority on Almost All Things.On the other hand, if one WANTED to use “unchartered,” it would mean “uncommissioned,” or in other words, “incomplete.” As if the map (“chart”) had never been paid for (“commissioned”) by anybody, and therefore was not done. Very similar idea to “uncharted.” Unfortunately, Lynne, it’s not true that “because someone said it doesn’t make it right.” If many people say it, or at least write it, lexicogrophers will tell that indeed does make it “right.” Language changes to reflect usage, not the other way around. That’s why people say “I could care less” when they really mean “I couldn’t care less,” and people use “literally” to mean “figuratively,” (the audience was “literally laughing their heads off” – really? Imagine that… literally), and why “cleave” has come to mean “separate” and “dust” has come to mean BOTH spread dust AND remove dust.

Lynne Posted June 13, 2006 at1:11 am   Reply

I was only quoting Sonya in saying “just because somebody says it doesn’t make it right.” I know that language changes to reflect usage… don’t we know someone who works for the dictionary that has explained this to us? πŸ™‚ You just wanted a little playful banter with your holding to the “unchartered” thing. I know you!

Anonymous Posted June 13, 2006 at1:20 am   Reply

you are all wrong. caleb

The Annoying one Posted June 13, 2006 at1:40 am   Reply

My word people, the DIXIE CHICKS said unchartered… what greater authority do you need?Gilligan ain’t got nothing on the Chicks.

anthony Posted June 16, 2006 at3:19 am   Reply

Yeah, I was just being funny. Turns out that “cut-and-dried,” though, is another one of those idioms that’s shifted its meaning over time. It apparently was first used in the 1700’s to describe something that was clichΓ©d, lacking in freshness like the “cut-and-dried” herbs at the market. Eventually it came to mean obvious, direct or uncomplicated. While we’re on the shifting idioms thing… how about “awful,” which used to mean “capable of inspiring awe,” and now just means “really really bad?”And has anyone ever had to explain the differences between “effect” as a noun, “effect” as a verb, “affect” as a noun, and “affect” as a verb–and why you can’t just use them all interchangeably?Nice going, Bill. Had to start a turf war with “word people,” didn’t ya. πŸ˜‰

Leave a reply

  • More news